A Response to Denil (2024)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14714/CP106.1981Abstract
Clarity of concepts and an honest respect for ideas and evidence are the hallmarks, in an ideal world, of meaningful and productive intellectual debate. In practice, however, rhetoric becomes heated and standards slip. At times, argumentation can cross into unethical distortion and fabrication. This is, unfortunately, the case with Mark Denil’s (2024) response to my critique (Edney 2022) of his essay seeking to define the map/non-map boundary (Denil 2022).
Published
2025-07-14
How to Cite
Edney, M. (2025). A Response to Denil (2024). Cartographic Perspectives, (106), 7–9. https://doi.org/10.14714/CP106.1981
Issue
Section
Peer-Reviewed Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Matthew H. Edney
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
